Editions Alecto had a four page ad in the December 1966 issue of Studio International, featuring As Is When:
Here are the other 3 pages, illustrating the quality and depth of the Editions Alecto artist squad of the time!
Saturday, 21 June 2014
Wednesday, 18 June 2014
Experience
Experience is the third print
in the As Is When suite.
In
her book, Eduardo Paolozzi, Diane
Kirkpatrick says of Experience:
What is the artist’s
subject? ‘The world is all that is the case’.
‘The structure of the proposition “depicts a possible combination of
elements in reality . . .”’ ‘All
experience is the world and does not need the subject’. In the print, the
visual pattern is a series of horizontal strips, each filled with an intricate
and richly varied collection of pattern fragments. The patterns appear to
blend, shift and even oscillate backward and forward in space. They might be visible thoughts, symbols for
experience unlimited by a finite physical subject.
Diane
refers to the viewer not simply perceiving a visual image, but undergoing a
distinct, physical experience, (like, for instance, an electric shock),
triggered by the work – something I have encountered most markedly by standing
in front of one of Bridget Riley’s very large paintings.
Paolozzi used elements from
Artificial Sun in creating the Tortured Life collage and subsequently cut
up a proof of that print into horizontal strips on a guillotine and
re-collaged them together again to make Experience,
while bromides of the same image became soldiers’ uniforms in a later sheet, (Wittgenstein the Soldier).
Five prints from As Is When still hung in the kitchen of his country home in 1980. Among them Tortured Life and Experience were the sheets that he said had given him the most pleasure from among his many graphic works. ‘These are the ones I like best,’ he said in 1976. ‘These are ones I keep looking at.’
Quotes from:
Eduardo Paolozzi Diane Patrick Studio Vista London 1970 SBN 28979756 x
Editions Alecto Tessa Sidey Lund Humphries Aldershot 2003 ISBN 0 85331 877 8
Wednesday, 4 June 2014
Tortured Life
Paolozzi closely identified on a personal level with
Wittgenstein – he once referred to As Is
When as a ‘combined autobiography’.
A major element of this was a mutual feeling of cultural alienation in
Britain – Paolozzi with his rural Italian heritage, in Leith, and Wittgenstein
from high society Vienna, in Manchester, Cambridge and London. Against the grain of much of the fashionable
thinking of their times, both Paolozzi and Wittgenstein considered their work
to be matters of activity rather
than abstract thinking/doctrine.
Geographically, Paolozzi seems to have been especially
interested in the Italian monastery at Monte Cassino, midway between Rome and
Naples. It was here that Wittgenstein
was confined as a prisoner-of-war during World War 1. Paolozzi’s father had come from the village of
Viticuso which is less than 10 miles east of Cassino.
Although born in Scotland, (1924), Paolozzi was interned
during World War 2 and his father, grandfather and uncle were lost at sea as a
result of a U-boat attack en-route to Canada.
This may well have given Paolozzi heightened empathy with Wittgenstein
in respect of his family tragedy –
three of his brothers committed suicide.
Wittgenstein himself contemplated the act, especially at times when he
felt disgust for the milieu of his occupation and way of life.
Wittgenstein felt that his ideas were generally
misunderstood and unappreciated in his time. This underlying theme was perhaps
Paolozzi’s main reason for identifying – and here depicting – Wittgenstein’s as
a tortured life.
The texts in Tortured
Life are from Georg von Wright’s writing on Wittgenstein:
Wright, one day in a trench on the eastern front while he was reading a
magazine in which there was a picture of the possible sequence of events in an
automobile accident. The picture, he
said served as a proposition where parts corresponded to things in reality, and
so he conceived the idea that a verbal propo
sition is in effect a picture. By
virtue of a similar correspondence between its parts and the world. In other words, the structure of the
proposition ‘depicts a possible combination of elements in reality, a possible
state of affairs’. The Tractatus
The proposition: ‘There is no hippopotamus in the room at present?’ When he
refused to believe this, I looked under the desks without finding one; but he
remained unconvinced.
Let us ask the question: ‘Should we say that the arrows > & <
point in the same direction or in different directions?’ At first sight you might be inclined to say ‘of
course in different directions’. But
One other aspect of Tortured Life is Paolozzi’s interest in the Laocoon – a Trojan priest most notably depicted with his two sons in an ancient sculpture located in the Vatican. The priest is shown fighting off an attack by sea serpents. Paolozzi apparently especially liked the strong visual dynamic of the sculpture and saw it as an iconic paradigm of human struggle.
One of the components for the collage is the chequer pattern used on the box for Cox’s gelatine – something locally and topically familiar to Paolozzi, and making a nice contrast with the exotic aspects of a deceased Austrian philosopher and high art involving an ancient Trojan!
And this is Paolozzi’s sculpture, Wittgenstein at Cassino: https://www.flickr.com/photos/harryhalibut/6045613167/in/pool-paolozzi
And his sculpture, Towards a New Laocoon:
Thursday, 15 May 2014
Artificial Sun - colour variation
At this time, Paolozzi was working on the leading edge of
the relatively-new-to Fine Art medium of silkscreen printing. This was
facilitated by the expertise of Chris Prater and his Kelpra Studio. Chris’s greatest
contribution probably lay in his prodigious skill with the knife. As Richard Hamilton later commented: . . .
‘one only has to see the ‘As Is When’ series to appreciate Chris Prater is the
greatest stencil cutter around’. Eduardo enjoyed the collaborative
aspects of working with Chris and his technicians, apparently valuing their
contributions to the finished product – this being very much opposed to the
traditional concept of the artistic genius working in splendid isolation and in
sole control of his output. Paolozzi was described
as being a dynamiter, applying, a knee to the groin of genteel middle-class
ideas about culture. More than anybody,
he was seen as having poured scorn on the romantic notion of the artist. All his work – the sculptures which came
together on the shop floor at Ipswich, as much as the graphics, realised for
him by the skills of professional printers, was an indication of this attitude.
A significant aspect of the approach was the variation of
colour for each image. In the colophon sheet included with the prints in
the Portfolio this is referred to: ‘The image is built up by multiple printings
through a colour chart, the final statement in each case varying according to
the programme of colour selection. This is possible only by the use of
precision techniques and photomechanical aids.’ Paolozzi and Prater had
first experimented with this concept in the 1963 prints, Metallization of a Dream (second
version) and Conjectures to Identity;
in As Is When this
was developed into a systematic routine such that no two prints of each image
are identical. According
to Pat Gilmour – author of several excellent books on printmaking – Paolozzi achieved
this by devising a permutation of no less than 88 colourways.
This
meant, paradoxically for a so-called’ mechanical’ process, that every image in
each edition was unique, playing havoc with craft maxims about
identicality. With a resounding tinkle,
the Guardian writer, (M. G. McNay), informed his readers that the secretary of the
Printmakers’ Council of Great Britain ‘barely tolerated’ Paolozzi’s suite. He also raised the stale Paris Biennale issue
again, hinting that the British Council had been wrong to send only
screenprints ‘in which photography was involved’ abroad and saying that in such
matters, the Printmakers’ Council felt itself ‘more qualified to judge’. This was typical of the constant barrage of uninformed
critical writing that screenprinting engendered.
Here are two further
versions of Artificial Sun to demonstrate colour variation:
Friday, 9 May 2014
As Is When begins . . .
In February 1964, (the month in which The Beatles were recording Can't Buy Me Love), Paolozzi made a work-note: collage called the artificial sun; series of collage based upon Wittgenstein precepts. The resulting images, published the following year, comprise the As Is When suite of screenprints – a ground breaking masterwork.
At this time, Paolozzi was 40 and best known for his sculpture and involvement with the proto-Pop Independent Group in London in the mid-Fifties. He had formed an interest in the Austrian philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein in the early-Fifties and this developed significantly and with great personal empathy when he read Norman Malcolm’s Memoir, published in 1958. Paolozzi found himself closely identifying himself and his art both with Wittgenstein’s philosophy and his, (problematic) life journey. Initially, this resulted in sculptures such as Wittgenstein at Casino: the photograph below shows Paolozzi in 1964 in New York where this piece was on exhibition at MOMA:
Artificial Sun is
the first of the 12 prints (plus Poster) and is dated 13th
May 1964. It is one of the nine prints
in the Suite based on Wittgenstein’s thinking; (the other three depict events/aspects
of Wittgenstein’s life). The
incorporated statement: The world is all
that is the case is a proposition from the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, the only work
published, (in 1921), before Wittgenstein’s death in 1951. In this reflection of his early
philosophical thinking, Wittgenstein contended that a verbal proposition is a
picture of reality. So now consider the
reality of Artificial Sun:
Saturday, 26 April 2014
Contemporary comment on Universal Electronic Vacuum
The December 1967 issue of Studio International featured a detail from Computer-Epoch on its cover:
Inside, in the Magazine's London Commentary section, Charles Harrison wrote about Universal Electronic Vacuum:
Inside, in the Magazine's London Commentary section, Charles Harrison wrote about Universal Electronic Vacuum:
One
of the more dazzling exhibitors in ‘Transatlantic Graphics’, Eduardo Paolozzi
speaks of the screenprints in his new series as failures. (Universal Electronic Vacuum is on exhibition at the ALECTO
GALLERY). If we can free ourselves from
the spell cast by images with a visual appeal and impact as strong as these
have, we may come to agree with him. The
failure is in the process, which, in reproducing the mental excitements of an
age in which so much information and so many stimuli are there to be absorbed,
can yet find no precise equivalent, in visual terms, for the activities of
scanning and digestion. This is of
course only a failure in comparative terms.
No one has travelled further than Paolozzi in search of a solution to
this particular problem nor come closer to finding one. For us it is the evidence of restless search
that makes these prints so intensely exciting.
Paolozzi has constantly pushed at the frontiers of printmaking, acting
as an ideas-man in a technological context.
Collage elements from all sources – Woolworths table cloths to computer
circuits, five and dime store cutouts to fine art reproductions – are manipulated
into a series of total images, constructed like nests of Chinese boxes, in
which the artist is involved so far as they are critical assessments of a given
situation. These collages are ‘translated’
by the screenprinter and printed in a range of colours decided by a part-arbitrary,
part systematic process which guarantees tonal balance. The printmaker acts as a servo-mechanism for
the ideas of the artist. The employment of
computers as means of reproducing episodes in the process of scanning is an
obvious next step upon which Paolozzi is already determined.
Meanwhile
there is much to learn from the Universal
Electronic Vacuum. The content of
the prints is one man’s singular consciousness in an age of multi-media,
expressed through the language of that age.
The artist feeds us with stimuli which we, so far as we respond to them,
can use to establish an image of his idea.
These gorgeous colours and dazzling shapes are not solely for our delectation. An understanding of the things he does – of his
behaviour in a visual sense – gives us insight into the experience of the artist
and enables us to share his idea. The
printed sheets of the Universal
Electronic Vacuum are not records of visual insights but ideas expressed in
visible form. The sets are printed in
such a way that no two runs of the same print produce the same arrangement of
colours. It is less important that the
colours are arranged as they are than that each print is different within the
same edition. What matters is the idea
of infinite difference, with its far-reaching implications for the structure of
our thinking about the art object. The
actual colours printed are no more than the record – the visual evidence – of this
idea. If the artist could convey his
ideas without needing to create objects which embody them, he would be no less
an artist. In human terms the artist is
the man whose ideas are most energetic.
He is no less than that and no more.
There
is a real possibility that the rapidly developing involvement with the
screenprint, often to the neglect of other, more fine art media, will have the
effect of forcing us to look more closely at the real content of art. It is a paradox that the artist may well be
able to reveal more of himself by leaving the execution of his ideas to the
technician. If the object itself,
seductive as it often is, can be so accurately specified and so easily
duplicated, perhaps we shall come at last to value its physical substance less
that the idea for which it is no more than a clothing.
Tuesday, 15 April 2014
The Poster and Text Page
Final limited edition screenprint in the Universal Electronic Vacuum suite is the Poster:
This, and the other UEV screenprints, were printed by Kelpra Studio. Editions Alecto, which had published the As Is When (1965) and Moonstrips Empire News (1967) suites, also produced a version of this poster. This was in a lithographed edition of 4,000, unsigned, unnumbered and unstamped. Image/paper size for this item is 903 mm x 565 mm whereas the limited edition prints are 1000 mm x 675 mm. The lithographed version is shown below:
The June 1968 issue of Studio International carried an ad by American Art Posters offering a 940cms x 635cms version of the poster, signed $25, unsigned $5.
The suite also includes a text page:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)