I suspect that Ernie
. . .is to be viewed just as the very pleasing composition of images and
pattern it is – I have been unable to deduce to whom/what ‘Ernie’ or ‘T.T’
refer: any suggestions welcome.
Donald . . . is clearly straightforward in terms of external
reference and a good example of Paolozzi’s love of combining ‘high’ with ‘low’
brow imagery. As for the iconography, it’s
notable that both Donald Duck and the painting style of Mondrian are instantly
recognisable however apparently artlessly they are represented. That must be a good test of how deeply ingrained into our consciousness a 'brand' has become, something I was exploring in my own painting back in 2003 - see example below, Turkish Delight:
In 1987 Paolozzi said: It is now acceptable to talk seriously about Mickey Mouse as an icon, and even to mention Mickey Mouse and Jesus in the same breath; (Quoted in Eduardo Paolozzi; Writings and Interviews, edited by Robin Spencer; ISBN 0-19-817412-8).
In 1987 Paolozzi said: It is now acceptable to talk seriously about Mickey Mouse as an icon, and even to mention Mickey Mouse and Jesus in the same breath; (Quoted in Eduardo Paolozzi; Writings and Interviews, edited by Robin Spencer; ISBN 0-19-817412-8).
No comments:
Post a Comment